Tag Archives: Ethics

Christian Ethics and the New Media – The Local Church and the New Media

Christian Ethics and the New Media: Introduction and Media Defined

Christian Ethics and the New Media: Scripture and Communication

Christian Ethics and the New Media: The Christian and the New Media

 

The Local  Church and the New Media

Just as the individual Christian has responsibility for right, ethical living in the realm of social networking and the New Media, local churches also play pivotal roles of responsibility in such a plethora of media.

Over her history, the Church has been fairly consistent in her adoption of various new technologies and media.  Whether it was the use of scrolls, codexes, books, magazines, newspapers, radio or television, the Church has generally done a fair job of keeping up with societal and technological changes and paradigm shifts in the forms and mediums of communication.

According to the Barna Group,

“People within the Christian community are just as immersed in (and dependent upon) digital technologies and social networks as are those outside of it. Both evangelical Christians and other born again Christians emerged as statistically on par with national norms when it came to each of the 15 different areas that were studied. In other words, matters of faith played very little role in differentiating people’s technological habits.”[1]

In a world that is increasingly connected and compartmentalized, the Church is left with a pressing problem.  On the one hand, according to David Kinnaman, “Church leaders have to strike the delicate balance between the spiritual and cultural potential of tech tools without surrendering to the false promise of these tools. Having the means of reaching the masses – for instance, through podcasting – is a good thing.”[2] The New Media, as a paradigm-shifting, conversation changing form of information communication, is precisely poised to be used in powerfully productive ways.  “Yet, nothing matches the potency of life-on-life discipleship. In this respect, social networking and blogs can be effective tools to intimately connect with a small, natural network of relationships. The key is using the technology in a way that is consistent with your calling and purpose, not just an addictive self-indulgence.” [3]

This statement by Kinnaman reveals both the weakness and the power of the New Media.  On the one hand, for its ability to quickly, effectively, efficiently and economically communicate information, the New Media is unmatched and unparalleled in human history.  Yet, this strength is also the New Media’s greatest weakness, for in providing such volumes of information, facades of familiarity and community can be erected and these facades can in fact impede any real attempts at valid, human relationship-building interaction.  For the Church, this means quite simply that there is no replacement for face-to-face, human, organic relationship growth.  Humans are communal creatures.[4] The New Media does not, and cannot satisfy this basic need.

Furthermore, the Church has a moral and ethical responsibility to work through the issues that these New Media present.  Kinnaman goes on to say

“One recent study we completed among teenagers showed that just 9% of church-going teens had learned something helpful about technology in their church during the past year. As each new generation becomes increasingly enmeshed with technology, these discussions and choices cannot be left to chance. Control, image, relevance, immediacy, transparency, purity, truth, stewardship, and escapism are some of the many issues that technology brings to the surface, not always with benign consequences.”[5]

Finally, the Church must understand and engage with the reality of the New Media, namely that it is a two-way conversation:

“Young people, for instance, think of themselves as creators of content, not merely consumers of it. Technology, in essence, gives them a voice and fuels their search for calling. Whether or not you welcome it, technology creates an entirely new calculus of influence and independence. The stewardship of technology as a force for good in culture is an important role for technologists, entrepreneurs, educators, and Christian leaders.”[6]

Local Churches must be equipped to deal with the ethical issues that the New Media bring.  While Media are amoral, they do not exist in a vacuum.  The medium, the agent of transference, not only conveys the message, but it works to shape it.  Ideas are nameless, substance less notions until they are given shape and definition by language.  Language in some sense is modified by the medium through which it is expressed.  The Church, as Christ’s Bride and Witness must be wary of her message being unnecessarily warped by the media she uses to express it.  Just because media are amoral does not mean that they are always necessarily right to use.  Likewise, just because various media are used in terrible, awful and sinful ways does not mean it is wrong to use those same media in right ways.  But one thing is certain: the Church is most assuredly called to remove herself from any naïveté regarding the New Media.  She is called by Her Lord to communicate in a way that honors Him and brings Him renown.  Her use (or misuse) of media will directly affect her ability to do that.

 

Conclusion

In the world of the Information Age, where communication and the New Media are kings, ethical issues abound.  Questions of privacy, idolatry, predation, stewardship, slander and libel are daily conundrums for millions of bloggers, Facebookers and Twitterers every day.  In a world of rapid change, where a massive paradigm shift has occurred in the way people communicate with one another and process information, confusion and fear can often rule the day.

Yet, God has not left the Christian in the dark.  The light of Scriptural truth shines and the Christian is provided with clear teachings and encouragements for how to rightly, morally and ethically communicate to other Christians and to the world around.  Whether it’s in the local church or on in the world of tweets and posts, blogs and vlogs, the Christian is called to rightly live and communicate, making the best use of the time, for the good of all men and for the glory of God.

 


[1] Barna Group, May 26, 2008, “Barna Technology Study: Social Networking, Online Entertainment And Church Podcasts,” http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/14-media/36-barna-technology-study-social-networking-online-entertainment-and-church-podcasts/ (accessed April 27, 2010).

[2] Barna Group, May 26, 2008, “Barna Technology Study: Social Networking, Online Entertainment And Church Podcasts,” http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/14-media/36-barna-technology-study-social-networking-online-entertainment-and-church-podcasts/ (accessed April 27, 2010).

[3] Barna Group, May 26, 2008, “Barna Technology Study: Social Networking, Online Entertainment And Church Podcasts,” http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/14-media/36-barna-technology-study-social-networking-online-entertainment-and-church-podcasts/ (accessed April 27, 2010).

[4] M.K. Smith, “Community,” in the encyclopedia of informal education,  ed, http://www.infed.org/community/community.htm. (accessed April 27, 2010).

[5] Barna Group, May 26, 2008, “Barna Technology Study: Social Networking, Online Entertainment And Church Podcasts,” http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/14-media/36-barna-technology-study-social-networking-online-entertainment-and-church-podcasts/ (accessed April 27, 2010).

[6] Barna Group, May 26, 2008, “Barna Technology Study: Social Networking, Online Entertainment And Church Podcasts,” http://www.barna.org/barna-update/article/14-media/36-barna-technology-study-social-networking-online-entertainment-and-church-podcasts/ (accessed April 27, 2010).

Christian Ethics and the New Media – The Christian and the New Media

Christian Ethics and the New Media: Introduction and Media Defined

Christian Ethics and the New Media: Scripture and Communication

 

The Christian and the New Media

This leaves the Christian with a series of questions.  First, the Christian must ask himself what he is communicating.  Is this blog post going to unfairly hurt somebody?  Is this comment on this friend’s Facebook page something that will edify the reader, or will it communicate hurt?  Is this YouTube video God-honoring, or man-honoring?  Is this particular Twitter post about the silly-bird-that-just-flew-past-my-window-for-the-10th-time-isn’t-that-cute intended to be an encouragement to one’s Twitter Followers, or is it simply an exercise in some rather pathetic narcissism?[1]

Secondly, the Christian must ask herself how she is communicating her information.  Does she post a hasty comment on a blog that has greatly angered her, or does she take her time to think (and maybe pray) about what she is close to saying?  Does she post on Twitter so often that her followers “un-follow” her because she has become so annoying?[2] Does she follow thousands of Twitter accounts to satisfy some problematic longing for the approval of complete strangers or to show that she really belongs?[3]

Third, the Christian must ask himself whom he is communicating to.  The openness of information in the New Media can be particularly problematic when it comes to issues of privacy[4], predation[5] and the sharing of sensitive information[6].  While social networks such as Facebook have championed the user’s right to privacy, such claims are often called into question.[7] The problems with predators alone are enough a possibility to cause parents to seriously consider some severe limitations on their children’s internet time.  The issue is a simple one, and is a weak spot for the New Media.  One often never really knows who one is communicating to or why they are receiving the communication.  Whether it’s a blog post that could be read by anybody from China (provided the site is not blocked by government censors[8]) to South Africa to Iceland to California or whether it’s a Facebook Note that “should” only be read by your friends, the question of exactly “who” is absorbing one’s communications is a vexing one.

Finally, the Christian is faced with the ever-slippery question of why.  Why is she is about to post this article or that video.  Why is she writing this blog post?  Why is she following this Twitter account?  Why is she viewing this YouTube clip, that Hulu movie or this message board?  This question cuts to the essence of what it is that she does and often reveals something of who she is.  Does she do it out of thanksgiving to God?  Is she in some small way seeking His honor?  Is she seeking the glory and fame of men?  Does she post this blog post so that she gains a readership so that she will be liked and subscribed to?  Does she comment on certain well-read blogs for the express purpose of people following the links back to her blog?  Does she come up with witty responses to friends’ Facebook posts so that they’ll see how clever she is?  Does she do it for attention?  For acceptance?  For some small measure of love?

These questions drive the Christian to pursue solution of the ethical quandaries that the New Media provides.  Christians are not given a Biblical roadmap showing how to particularly navigate through the Internet wilderness.  They are provided with some fairly clear principles dealing with communication, though, and in reality, communication of ideas and information is what the New Media is all about


[1] David Sarno, “Don’t fear invasion of the mindcasters,” LA Times, March 11 2009, http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/03/on-twitter-mind.html. (accessed April 26, 2010).

[2] Nitrozac and Snaggy, The Joy of Tech, Comic, Picture http://www.geekculture.com/joyoftech/joyarchives/1202.html. (accessed April 26, 2010).

[3] Wefollow.com, “Home Page,” http://wefollow.com// (accessed 26 April, 2010).

[4] Daniel J. Solove, “Do Social Networks Bring the End of Privacy?,” Scientific American, September, 2008,, http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=do-social-networks-bring/ (accessed April 26, 2010).

[5] John Kreiser, “MySpace: Your Kids’ Danger?,” CBS News, February 6 2006, Video and Article http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/02/06/eveningnews/main1286130.shtml/ (accessed April 26, 2010).

[6] Liz Gannes, “U.s. Military Turns To Social Networking To Encourage Sharing Official And Sensitive Info,” Gigaom, January 22, 2010, http://gigaom.com/2010/01/22/u-s-military-turns-to-social-networking-to-encourage-sharing-official-and-sensitive-info// (accessed April 26, 2010).

[7] Doug Gross, “Sharing Vs. Your Privacy On Facebook,” CNN, April 1, 2010, http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/ptech/04/01/facebook.developers.privacy/index.html. (accessed April 26, 2010).

[8] Tania Branigan, “Google Raises Stakes In China Censorship Row,” Guardian, March 22, 2010, http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/mar/22/google-china-shut-down-censorships/ (accessed April 26, 2010).

Christian Ethics and the New Media – Media Defined

Introduction

The New Media presents the Christian with many interesting ethical questions.  The prevalence of social networks, blogs, micro-blogs, web videos, emails and video chats attest to the fact that the present world is a thoroughly technological one.  Information and the gathering of information rule the land.  Communication in many mediums is key.

In living through such a world, the Christian is faced with many ethical dilemmas.  The sharing and communication of so much information presents ethical quandaries in the realms of narcissism, privacy, predation, slander, libel and idolatry.  These problems are not easy.  Media, in its pure form, is amoral.  It can be used for good and it can be used for ill.

Media Defined

This essay is not intended to deal with ethics involved with the journalism and television industry, the so-called “Mainstream Media”[1].  It is not even directly involved with the New Journalism[2] that has emerged as a force within the New Media.  It is rather concerned with media as the plurality of mediums, a medium being “An agency by which something is accomplished, conveyed, or transferred”[3].  Specifically, this understanding of media is concerned with the communication (the transference) of ideas.  In the realm of the New Media, this communication occurs with a heretofore unparalleled ease and economy.  While mass communication has been around for millennia through audible or written means, and though the world has seen great advances in humanity’s ability to mass communicate through newspapers, radio and television, what is currently happening through the New Media is astonishing.  The emergence of the Internet and other networking technologies, specifically the recent emergence of Internet social networking has given anybody and everybody the means to communicate to the masses.

While books, newspapers, radio and television allowed those with the means to communicate to the world with relative ease, the conversation has always been one-dimensional.  With the advent of social networking and blogging, the conversation has become multi-directional.  Everybody can communicate information relatively simply and fairly cheaply.

This then brings up a rather vexing question: How are Christians to rightly and ethically communicate?  Thankfully, while the Bible does not provide the Christian with detailed instructions regarding the proper use of Facebook, it does provide God-given commands and encouragements regarding how Christians speak and communicate with one another and with the world.


[1] Noam Chomsky, Z Magazine, October, 1997, http://www.chomsky.info/articles/199710–.htm. (accessed 28 April, 2010).

[2] Jeff Bercovici, “Op-ed: The New Journalism,” The New York Observer, February 23, 2010, http://www.observer.com/2010/media/new-journalism/ (accessed April 28, 2010).

[3] The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed., s.v. “medium.”, Dictionary.com http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/medium/ (accessed 26 Apr., 2010).

Book Reviews – “Strange Virtues” by Bernard T. Adeney

Strange Virtues – Ethics in a Multicultural World. By Bernard T. Adeney, InterVarsity Press Academic, 1995. 281 pages. Softback.

Ethics, both in study and in practice, is a not-trivial exercise.  In many ways it is where the rubber meets the proverbial road, that place where religion, philosophy and human interactions intersect (sometimes violently) as people try to “do right” by each other.  In a world as divergent and varied as this one, there seem to be as many ethical standards, codes and systems as there are people to implement them.  Violent collisions of different ethical assumptions and practices occur daily as people deal with one another.  As the world networks and becomes truly global, these cross-cultural ethical conundrums become more and more frequent and harried.  Travel is no longer needed to experience this distinctly human phenomenon, as the world has truly “come to our door”, both in the form of immigrants and the world wide internets.   It is no longer a question of if one will endure these ethical collisions, but a question of how to handle it when it does happen.  Thankfully, this is a situation that men like Bernard Adeney attempt to understand and while there are some conclusions that some authors such as Adeney come to, their advice is helpful and frankly, necessary.

Adeney’s purpose for writing Strange Virtues is clearly stated in the form of a question: “How do we respond to situations where our values are incongruent with those of another culture?” (14) Simply put, people believe differently from each other.  They have different values and different understandings of right and wrong.  They have different political systems, religious convictions and cultural ceremonies.  Different cultures have different views on what constitutes morality, manners, relations and proper epistemology.  Cultures vary in how virtue is achieved and what is “…the vision of a virtuous person in a good community.” (15)  Rightly understanding these various perspectives and rightly responding to them can be a tricky business.  The job becomes more difficult, in some respects, when one approaches the conundrum from the perspective of Christianity.  Christian belief and doctrine are at their core exclusive.  There are things that Christianity states are Truth and which it cannot budge from, or else it ceases to be biblical Christianity.  It is not generally a religion of plurality and diversity of beliefs when it comes down to its core issues.  Yet the Bible does not lay out patterns of expected behavior for every particular ethical possibility.  In “Strange Virtues” Adeney brings up issues of bribery, theft, lying and honor where at first glance the appropriate ethical action may be obvious to our western sensibilities, but when viewed from the context of another culture, there is always more than meets the eye.  As such, “Strange Virtues” is written by a Christian to Christians (particularly in the West) to encourage them to think out of and think through their ethical and cultural boxes and consider what Christianity teaches from other cultural perspectives.  Doing so can be fraught with danger, but it can also be enriching and rewarding.  

If anything, “Strange Virtues” is a book seeking balance.  Prescriptionist applications of Biblical commands and principles can be a good thing.  Absolutist understandings of culture and the world about can be healthy and in fact is actually necessary and natural.  Yet Adeney also understands the dangers of prescriptionism and absolutism in the realm of Christian Ethics when they are divorced from the Word and Will of God.  It is a good thing to behave a certain way based on what God says in Scripture.  Yet doing “good” based on your interpretation of what God says in Scripture can be another story entirely.  Realistically, it is next to impossible to do one without the other.  Yet, it is all too easy to allow culture assumptions and perspectives to creep in; taking the place of authority that should be kept for the Word and the work of the Holy Spirit.

As a parallel, in asking Westerners to think outside of their cultural shells (while encouraging them to remain in them), Adeney does a fair job in presenting the perspectives of other cultures.  When it comes to issues like bribery, most Americans would recoil at the thought of paying money to civil servants in payment for some service rendered.  There are rules of law in America that discourage such practices.  Adeney reminds the reader that this practice can be quite common in Asian countries, but not for the reasons Americans might think.  In pointing to different cultural assumptions within peoples of the West and the East, the Author points out that it is quite possible that the gift or favor might be done, not out of greed or a desire for more wealth by the official, but because of Eastern focus on relationships and honor.  To his credit, Adeney does not allow that this by definition should free such practices from the charges of bribery, but he does ask the reader to consider the situation more fully from an ethical perspective before rendering judgment.  

Additionally, Adeney shares some very helpful advice on communication in his chapter “Strange Communication”.  Any person who has been married for any amount of time knows just how important communication is.  In marriage, there is in some sense a wedding of cultures.  There is a man and a woman being married.  Both think different, function differently and feel differently.  Likewise, marriage is the joining of two people from different families.  Families form their own miniature sub-cultures, complete with family dialects, philosophies and perspectives.  For two such different people to have a successful, faithful marriage, communication and understanding must be a driving focus.  Likewise, cross-cultural understanding starts at cross-cultural communication.

I will never forget a weekend we spent with a French family in 1970.  My wife and I picked up Jean Marie, who was hitchhiking outside Paris.  We were just beginning to study French, and he spoke no English.  When we left him off, he invited us to his home in a small village for the weekend.  There, through music, laughter, food, wine, children, flowers, chores and shared grief over the injustice of the world, we became like brothers and sisters.  Of the few words that we were able to exchange, only one do I remember as significant: the French word simpatique expressed what we had found together. (127)

Adeney goes on to explain that communication need not even be purely verbal.  As stated above, it can take the form of laughter, music, food and beauty, but it does require the effort of two or more parties submitting their ignorance and swallowing their pride to become a learner in a strange situation or setting.

Adeney’s most helpful portion of the book follows along the same lines, and that is his discussion on the “adaptation of the role of a stranger” (130).  In particular, his explanation of the three stages of assimilation is especially enlightening.  The first stage is the “preliminary stage” or the “honeymoon stage”.  This is the time in the transition where the stranger is new and strange to the host culture, and the host culture is new and strange to the stranger.  It is a time of new experiences and sensory overload, where everything is exciting, and both the host and the stranger tends to put their best feet forwards.  Close on its heels, though, is the “Transition Stage”.  While the stranger is now accepted in this stage, his novelty has worn off and he might often be ignored.  “The host wants to know how committed the guest really is and how long they are likely to stay.  The guest wants to know if he or she is really still welcome and how long that is likely to continue.  Neither side wants to be simply exploited for the interests of the other.” (135) Finally, if he is accepted, the stranger becomes incorporated into the culture.  She is now completely free to be one of the members of the host culture.  Yet, a former stranger, while completely accepted, will never be “blood kin” but will be accepted as an adopted child.  Quoting Gittins, Adeney goes so far as to say that “…if strangers are unwilling to accept this and show it in their attitudes, they are unlikely to be incorporated into the culture.” (136).

As helpful as this book is, it is not without its weaknesses and shortfalls.  Perhaps the biggest shortcoming of the book is Adeney’s attempted pluralistic tightrope act.  It is one thing to be a pluralist, but Adeney becomes something of a meta-pluralist by attempting to be a pluralistic, inclusivistic and exclusivistic all at once.  To be fair, Adeney does pose the proper questioning observation “If all religions are equal and truth is equally unknown by all, then there is no standpoint from which to condemn any religious practices”.  This is a problem that pure pluralism has no solution for, but Adeney tries too hard to balance too much.  He wants to sympathize with liberal Christians as well as with conservative evangelical Christians, but his attempts at doing so ring hollow.  In particular, his chapter titled “The Ethical Challenges of Other Religions” is rather unfortunate as he does a poor job of understanding other religions from a Christian perspective.  In fact, his critique could really masquerade as a critique from a fair minded agnostic discussing all the major religions of the world.  His repeated statements of the “goodness” of committed, sincere practitioners of these religions (even Christianity!) are troublesome at best when considered in light of the Ten Commandments and Romans 3.  

“Strange Virtues” is most helpful to the Christian man or woman considering cross-cultural work.  Adeney’s discussion on humbly submitting to the host culture as a stranger is golden and is extremely helpful and encouraging.  Likewise, his repeated focus on encouraging Christians to consider their beliefs in light of possible inherent cultural assumptions is very helpful.  It is all too easy to supersede God’s Word and Law with what culture and personality says and then judge people by it.  Such behavior is especially unfortunate when it comes to poor cross-cultural communication.  Quiet respect for one man might be rank rudeness to another.  It would be sad indeed for the second man to become angry, when the first man was simply attempting to be respectful.  Yet, not being mindful of such cross-cultural intricacies can cause great harm.

Still, understanding one’s own culture is even more important than understanding another.  Human beings often unknowingly create cross-cultural blind spots and immunities.  Learning from other cultures help to reveal those blind spots and allow the Christian to better submit himself to God and to His Word.  Such a man is then better prepared to move into a strange culture with strange virtues because he is better grounded in the Word of God, the Truth that transcends all cultures and peoples and time.  

“Strange Virtues”, while not without some serious problems, is a thoughtful, thought-provoking, and ultimately encouraging treatise on the problem of cross-cultural ethics and how the Christian is to understand them, live with them and honor God by them.

Quote of the Week – Wade Burleson and Spiritualizing Life

“Bottom line: I wish Christian people would simply state the plain truth and stop spiritualizing everything. How many pastors say “God has called me to another church” when it is more accurate to say “I have an opportunity to go to a bigger church that will pay me a larger salary which will possibly enhance the opportunties and influence I have in terms of my ministerial career.” I, frankly, would find the latter–if ever said–refreshing…It’s about time we Southern Baptists agree to stop spiritualizing and simply state the truth. We may find one day God’s not quite as thrilled as we think He is about us attaching His name to everything we Southern Baptists say or do.”

Wade Burleson on Over-Spiritualizing Life