Category Archives: Random

Thoughts on Biblically Living and Serving Incarnationally, Part 2

There are scores of ideas in our contemporary milieu of evangelical thought on how to best accomplish our Christ-given Great Commission Responsibility. There are many various and sundry models, concepts and strategies that are used to bring the message of Jesus to a lost and dying world in ways that are missional, confrontational, contextual, relevant and incarnational.

All of these ideas and means can be well and good, so long as they are within the realm of biblical thought, principles and orthodoxy. Is that not the rub? Are we biblical in our methodologies or do we evangelize according to our own abilities and devices? Our evangelical strategies and missiological frameworks must be examined in light of and submitted to the Truth of God’s Written Will and Word. As such, please permit me to submit to you a biblical model of incarnational missionary church planting, based on the example of the early Church as led by the Holy Spirit.

As much as we read and hear about the epistle writer Paul, it is very enlightening to understand how Paul became the Missionary Church Planter we read about in the book of Acts and in his letters. After his Damascus Road Experience, Paul does not automatically seek to become a missionary church planter.  After a time of learning from the Lord in Arabia, he sought to be with the disciples, in Damascus and Jerusalem. He recognized the need for the community and accountability that a group of like-minded believers can provide for each other. Then, when the need arose, Barnabas went to Tarsus (where Paul had been sent by the disciples in Jerusalem, because he had severely angered the Hellenists with his bold and biblical preaching), found Paul, brought him back to Antioch and together they ministered to the saints. The Scripture then says that in those days a prophecy was made concerning a famine in Jerusalem, so that the church in Antioch, taking responsibility to help their brothers in Jerusalem, sends Barnabas and Paul to Jerusalem with relief. We’re then told in Acts 13:1-3 that while the disciples in Antioch were worshipping and fasting that the Holy Spirit sets Barnabas and Paul apart for the work that was prepared for them to do. And, in obedience, the local church in Antioch sends Barnabas and Paul on God’s mission.

It is in the middle of Acts 13 that we see a major shift in Paul’s Ministry. He takes the lead. The student had concluded that stage of his education and training and took the leadership responsibility of the missionary team. From that point on in Acts, we see Paul planting churches in Ephesus, Corinth, Galatia, Thessalonica, and Philippi. It is important to note that Paul planted churches in major cities. It is from these urban centers that the indigenous churches were planted and from the urban areas that these planting churches planted.

In addition to Paul, we see this same example of serving/submitting, teaching/learning, sending and planting in Timothy and Titus. Both were men discipled under the ministry of Paul, both were trained in some measure by Paul and both then had the responsibility of discipling, mentoring and leading other men and churches.

Based off of the examples of Barnabas, Paul, Timothy and Titus, I would submit to you the following model for Biblical Missionary Church Planting:

In the next post in this series, I’ll explain what each element of the model means and why it matters.

Thoughts on Biblically Living and Serving Incarnationally, Part 1

There is much talk in evangelical circles on living missionally, incarnationally and with relevance.  There are strategies and ideas, concepts and creative methodologies to achieve such a mission.  Some are accused of going too far in this quest, outside of the realm of orthodoxy; and some are accused of not going far enough, not knowing how to get their tushes out of the church pews.  How does one balance these considerations? Here are some thoughts (and Lord willing born out by biblical examples).

To begin with, I believe very strongly that if a person is to minister to a group of people, that person must know the people. In order to know the people, that person must live with the people. To genuinely live with the people, that person must live like the people. This idea is, I believe, firmly rooted in the incarnation of Christ.

On one hand, no man can live incarnationaly like Christ. He is the God-Man, we’re simply men. He humbled himself as deity to live as a human being. I can never hope to come even remotely close to that kind of sacrifice. But, in Christ, I can at least attempt something that is in a similar vein. When Christ came to earth, he did not commune with angels all the time and then at specific times venture out.  He experienced exhaustion like we do. His body needed replenishment like ours does. He went to the bathroom like we do. He felt emotions like we do. He reasoned with a human brain like we do.  He did not cop out or wimp out. He went through what he had to in order to save a people for his Father. In His incarnation He showed just how thoroughly He loves us. He was not sent by the Father to amuse Himself or to please Himself or to have a vacation. He was sent to be incarnated, to live amongst us, in perfection, to die for us and to be raised from the dead for us. If that kind of a mission propelled Christ, should it not also propel us? Are we not striving in this life to be Christ-like?  If a person is called to go overseas or to another culture, should he/she not give up his/her way of life here in the States to serve amongst a people, living for Christ, and learning the ways of another people in order to minister to and make Christ known to them? Or, if you’re not called to go overseas and you’re called to stay at home in the States, should you not study the ways of your people in order to minister to and make Christ known to them?

To think about it another way, the goal of the missionary church-planter is to plant indigenous churches.  If you’re not leaving your home to go serve the Lord in another culture, are you not serving already in indigenous churches? Another example of living incarnationally is the Apostle Paul.  As he rightly declared in Philippians, he was a Hebrew of Hebrews.  Paul knew the Jewish culture, religion, society and way of life.  He was raised with it and before Christ grabbed a hold of him and saved him he worshiped it.  Likewise, as can be seen in Acts 17, Paul knew something of Athenian culture.  He had read their prophets and studied their objects of worship.  Yet Paul, in being “all things to all men” still preached the same message: Christ and Him crucified.  In preaching a message that was absolutely insulting to Hebrews and Greeks (being a stumbling block to the Jews and foolishness to the Gentiles), Paul ministered and lived and preached and pastored to both groups of people.  Paul did not sit on his haunches.  He went and he lived.  YET, neither did Paul so relate to the culture around him that he destroyed the message of Christ.  In fact, more often this not, he was so ardent in preaching this message that he was almost killed for it, multiple times, and and in very creative and painful ways.  (see Paul’s litany of his sufferings for the sake of Christ in 2 Corinthians 11:16-33).

What does this incarnational ministry look like though?  I’ll give my thoughts of it in the next part.  :-)

Tension and the Christian (Some questions from a Christian in Tension)

In many ways, the Christian life is full of tension. This is seen most acutely in the internal war between the flesh and the spirit. When presented with sin, sometimes parts of us want to sin and we don’t, but sometimes we do. Most of the time we don’t want to sin, we want to do good, but we still sin anyways ( Romans 7:7-25 ).  We live in this world, but we’re not of this world ( John 15:18-19 ). We fight against multi-cultural pluralism, but we must also ward off arrogant ethno-centrism( 1 John 2:15-17 ). We’re not fatalists, but neither are we emotionalists. God’s in control, but we’re still held responsible for our lives. We must communicate the Gospel well, yet we must never ever lost the message of the Truth of Jesus Christ ( 1 Corinthians 9:19-23 ).  We plead with men to turn to Jesus and be saved, yet we know that we ultimately have not the ability to save them; we must leave the saving up to God ( Ephesians 1-2 ).  We love our spouses, but we don’t love them the most. We care for our families, yet we understand that eternity will be spent with a much bigger, global family ( Luke 20:34-36 ).  We love our unbelieving friends, but we know that we can never have real, brotherly communion so long as they are apart from Christ ( 2 Corinthians 6:14-15 ).  We strive to be sanctified, but we know we do not ultimately have the power ( John 17:18-23 ).  We preach to the lost and trust God to do His work, but we don’t really know what that might look like; some might believe, but some might also be hardened even further (we thus become God’s tool for a worse condemnation) ( Isaiah 6).  We live on this planet, in nations, societies, clans, cultures and families, yet we know in our heart, in our core, that this world is not our home ( 1 Peter 2:11-12 ).

Why the tension?  Why is the Christian pulled into so many different directions?  Is it a perspective thing?  Some might say that the Christian life could be thought of as an attempt to balance on that wire of tension between any number of extremes. Yet, is this the reality? Is life in Christ about balancing between vastly different (and wrong) ideas, or should it be about standing on the Standard? Is the balance dictated by the extremes, or are the extremes defined by the balance? Is right defined by all the wrong in the world, or is the wrong understood to be wrong by what is right? Is holiness defined by sin or is sin defined by holiness?  Is Truth defined as being non-false, or is False thought of as being  non-True?  Are such distinctions even appropriate?

The End of the Great Commission? 10 Questions.

As Jesus was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples came to him privately. “Tell us,” they said, “when will this happen, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the end of the age?”

Jesus answered: “Watch out that no one deceives you.  5 For many will come in my name, claiming, ‘I am the Christ,a’ and will deceive many.  You will hear of wars and rumors of wars, but see to it that you are not alarmed. Such things must happen, but the end is still to come.  Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places.  All these are the beginning of birth pains.

“Then you will be handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will be hated by all nations because of me.  At that time many will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each other,  and many false prophets will appear and deceive many people.  Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of most will grow cold,  but he who stands firm to the end will be saved.  And this gospel of the kingdom will be preached in the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.

- Matthew 24:3-14

Question #1:

When we define “unreached” people groups, how much reliance are we placing on ideas born of sociological, anthropological, linguistic, philosophical and psychiatric disciplines in order to hasten the conclusion of the Great Commission and the advent of Christ’s Return?

Question #2:

In trying to bring about the conclusion of the Great Commission and the advent of Christ’s Return, how much focus are we placing on making people groups “reached” and how much focus are we placing on primarily evangelizing all sinners?

Question #3:

In defining “unreached” people groups, are we considering the effects that time has (in terms of the evolution of language, interbreeding, emerging people groups, etc.) on the structure and makeup of the nations?

Question #4:

Assuming, again, that we are defining people groups correctly and appropriately what is our confidence level that we have done our research correctly? Have we thoroughly mapped these unreached groups (especially to the point that we can confidently expect the return of Christ when the number of unreached people groups reaches zero)?

Question #5:

Are we defining “unreached” correctly?

Question #6:

Are we defining “reached” correctly?

Question #7:

What do we do about the people in the reached group who are born into sin and are outside of Christ? Do we focus too much on the unreached groups such that are we forgetting about generations of new sinners?

Question #8:

In striving so hard to bring Jesus back again, are we failing in our duty and privilege to evangelize the lost in order to get to heaven sooner?

Question #9:

In striving to “evangelize the world in our generation” are we failing to teach the next and upcoming generation[s] to evangelize the lost? Is the Missio Dei so dependent upon us? Have we considered that perhaps God might not complete His Mission in our lifetime? Do we forget that just as the past 2000 years worth of generations were called to evangelize the world, that we are called to that as well and that the generation following us will most likely still have work to do? Are we willing to admit that another generation might very well have the privilege of being on earth when Jesus Returns?

Question #10:

Are we not called to evangelize, making disciples of all peoples and that Christ will always be with us, even to the end of the age? Should we not focus on Christ’s Great Commission and leave the saving, completing and returning up to Him?

The Non-Conditionality of God’s Eternal Reality

God’s self-designation of the “I am” is the only non-conditional reality that can ever be. Or, to phrase it another way, it is the only self-conditional statement that can ever be.

To explain: God cannot be unless he has always been. Existence cannot be unless God is. How is this so? Because everything else that is, is conditioned upon God being. For instance, the very language we use to describe such ideas are dependent upon the condition of God (who made language) being. Our own reality can only be understood with the condition that God is. Creation is conditioned and dependent upon a Creator. Love is conditioned on a Lover. God’s Grace is conditioned on the reality of sin (as well as the Sinner and the Grace-Giver) which is conditioned upon God’s Holiness which is conditioned on the essence of God’s character which is conditioned on God’s existence. If God is not the “I am”, then there is no such thing as holiness and thereby no standard with which to condition sin and thereby no sinner and thereby no Grace to save us from our sin. Scripture is conditioned by the reality of a God who reveals Himself and Truth itself is conditioned upon a God who defines it.

Because God is, reality itself is possible and in fact actual. God’s existence is because He is. He is because He exists. He is the un-conditioned Reality from which all reality is understood and known. He is not bound to any external understandings or realities. He defines what is, because He is. He is the un-influenced Influencer, the un-moved Mover, the non-Created Creator, and the non-conditioned Reality.

Some Hard Questions

There has been a good amount of discussion in recent weeks and months within Baptist circles on how exactly we are to “do church” and “do worship” and “do missions”.  As such, there is a great deal of healthy suspicion of ideas that are new and different.  Much of the concern is justified.  If we are worshiping or witnessing or evangelizing in a way that supersedes the truths of Scripture, or if we are not trusting God to communicate, through His Word, but are rather trusting ourselves and our own clever creativity, then we have some real soul-searching to do.

My question then is this: Is it not possible that our traditional ways of doing evangelism and worship and Christian living should also be subjected to the same scrutiny?  If we sang fewer songs or prayed at different parts of the service or ceased having a Baptist Altar Call, would our members think that we had left a Biblically prescribed mode of worship?  If we stopped handing out tracts or going door-to-door, would our people believe that we had stopped evangelizing biblically?  Has our understanding of the Bible become so wed to our traditions that anything besides those traditions smacks to us of heresy (or at least the seeds of it)?

Put another way, is it not possible that our insistence on doing church and evangelism “biblically” is really an attempt to communicate the Bible to our church members (in good standing) in ways that they will understand?  And is this communication of a nature such that we are practicing the same distrust and disdain for the power and efficacy of the Scriptures (and dare I say, of the Gospel itself) that we suspect and charge the “new” and the “different” with?

Are we really looking to live biblically as Christians, or is our understanding of Christ, the Church and how we relate to both fundamentally dependent on our own understanding?  Are we submitting to Christ and to His Word, or are we judging others by our faulty standards, traditions, restraints, constraints and assumptions?

Blue Thousand and One

There is nothing quite like a bunch of skinny bald guys painted blue being hit with balloons filled with multi-colored liquids, to the music of 2001 Space Odyssey.

Nothing at all.


Blue Thousand and One from Blue Man Group HD on Vimeo.

Slow Motion HD Work

ZING

Michael Spencer on Ed Young‘s recent 7-Day Sex Challenge:

“Dear Ed Young Jr. “

Thanking the Idiots who made you rich.

Well, at least the guy shows candor

Saint Obama?

I don’t really know what to do with this.

Dochum Glóire Dé amháin

I’ve been trying my best to learn Irish Gaelic (Gaeilge), and I came across the Gaeilge way to say “Soli Deo Gloria” (or , “to the glory of God alone), and I figured I’d share:


Dochum Glóire Dé amháin

Cool, eh?

Piper and Carson on being a Pastor Theologian

The Desiring God Blog announced a very interesting evening of lectures by D.A. Carson and John Piper on what it means to be a Pastor-Theologian.

More info can be found here.

Psalm 62 and a Timely Reminder During Election Season

In my reading this morning I read Psalm 62.

For God alone(B) my soul(C) waits in silence;
from him comes my salvation.
(D) He only is my rock and my salvation,
my(E) fortress;(F) I shall not be greatly shaken.

How long will all of you attack a man
to batter him,
like(G) a leaning wall, a tottering fence?
They only plan to thrust him down from his(H) high position.
They take pleasure in falsehood.
(I) They bless with their mouths,
but inwardly they curse.

Selah

For God alone, O(J) my soul, wait in silence,
for my hope is from him.
(K) He only is my rock and my salvation,
my fortress; I shall not be shaken.
On God rests my(L) salvation and my glory;
my mighty rock,(M) my refuge is God.

(N) Trust in him at all times, O people;
(O) pour out your heart before him;
God is(P) a refuge for us.
Selah

(Q) Those of low estate are but a breath;

those of high estate(R) are a delusion;

in the balances they go up;

they are together lighter than a breath.

Put no trust in extortion;

(S) set no vain hopes on robbery;

(T) if riches increase, set not your heart on them.

(U) Once God has spoken;
(V) twice have I heard this:
that power belongs to God,
and that to you, O Lord,(W) belongs steadfast love.
For you will(X) render to a man
according to his work.

-Psalm 62

During the rest of this election season both candidates will promise us a better economy, better national security, better health care, and a generally better life.

As such, we would do well to remember the words of Psalm 62.  John McCain and Barack Obama are but a breath.  They’re a vapor.  In and of themselves they are simply vanity.  But the Lord, He is our refuge and our trust.  No matter who wins this presidential election, we are assured of this, that the Lord is still reigning, that God is still ruling, and that His Purposes will never be thwarted.

For God alone , O my soul, wait in silence,
for my hope is from him.
He only is my rock and my salvation,
my fortress; I shall not be shaken.
On God rests my salvation and my glory;
my mighty rock, my refuge is God.

Amazing Grace

This is just too good.

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MS93Q4jQAO0]

A Nicewander Announcement

So, I’m pumped.  :-)

[youtube=http://youtube.com/watch?v=_Ze4UNvsW84]